The low hum of the server rack is the only thing making any progress. For forty-two minutes, the ‘product squad’ has been orbiting the color of a single button on the checkout page. It’s a shade of blue. Or maybe teal. Or periwinkle, if you ask Marcus, who just learned that word.

“

‘It just feels… passive,’ Chloe says, tracing the shape of the button on the massive monitor with her finger. ‘We want action. We want urgency.’

“

Ben, who leads the design chapter, leans back so far his chair groans in protest. ‘But the data from the last 22 A/B tests showed a negligible difference between “action blue” and “calm sea foam.” The confidence interval is a joke.’

A tense silence settles over the room, thick with unspent opinions and the fear of being the one who sounds stupid. There is no manager. There is no decider. There is only the Collaborative, the Team, the Flat-as-a-Pancake Org Chart we all praised during our onboarding. Empowerment, they called it. Agency. Everyone has a voice.

And when everyone has a voice, the result is often a chorus of indecisive murmuring. Nothing gets done. Nothing moves forward. The button remains a bland, default gray on the staging server.

The stalemate is finally broken by Alex. Alex is a senior backend engineer, technically on the same level as everyone else in the room. But Alex is… Alex. He’s charismatic, has a great laugh, and once fixed the CEO’s laptop during an all-hands meeting, earning a company-wide round of applause. Everyone wants to be liked by Alex. He doesn’t have authority, but he has something far more potent: social capital. He squints at the screen, then says with a casual shrug, ‘I dunno, I guess the first blue is fine. Let’s just ship it.’

It’s like a spell has been broken. Chloe nods immediately. ‘Yeah, you’re right. It’s fine.’ Ben’s chair comes crashing forward. ‘Good call. Blue it is.’ The decision is made. Not by data, not by design principles, but by the gravitational pull of the coolest kid at the table.

The Invisible Chains of Flat Hierarchy

This is the dirty secret of the structureless organization. We got rid of the org chart, but we didn’t get rid of power. We just made it invisible. We traded explicit authority, which you can see and question and appeal, for a covert hierarchy based on charisma, tenure, favoritism, and who’s best at navigating the treacherous social currents. It’s not a democracy; it’s a high school cafeteria with stock options. Power didn’t vanish; it just became a shadow game, and it’s exhausting.

The Unspoken Rules

For years, I pronounced the word ‘hierarchy’ as ‘hear-archy.’ I just did. No one ever corrected me, and I Read More In this article it more than I said it, so the shape of the word in my head had the wrong sound attached. The moment I heard it said correctly in a documentary, a hot flush of embarrassment washed over me. How could I have been so wrong for so long? But everyone in my little world either didn’t notice or was too polite to say anything. We had an unspoken, unwritten agreement to accept my flawed version. This is precisely what happens in flat organizations. An entire vocabulary of unspoken rules, alliances, and debts emerges, and you’re just supposed to figure it out. Newcomers are at a total disadvantage, left to decipher a culture that prides itself on having no rules while being governed by hundreds of them.

I’ve been railing against this kind of passive-aggressive system for a while now, arguing for clear ownership and decisive leadership. Which is why it’s so difficult to admit that last Tuesday, I ran a two-hour ‘ideation session’ with no agenda, no facilitator, and no stated goal other than to ‘see what happens.’ It was a beautiful, chaotic mess that produced exactly zero actionable ideas and left three people deeply confused about their quarterly goals. I criticized the game, and then I dealt the cards myself.

Structure as Freedom

My friend Morgan P.-A. is an aquarium maintenance diver. Her job involves plunging into a 42-foot-deep tank with sharks, rays, and moray eels to scrub algae off artificial coral. Her work environment has no room for ambiguity. There is a 232-step pre-dive checklist. Every piece of gear is inspected, logged, and signed off on. The hierarchy is crystal clear: there is a surface tender, a divemaster, and the diver. Communication protocols are rigid and brutally efficient. Morgan doesn’t get to have a consensus meeting with the tiger sharks about the best way to clean Sector Gamma-2. The structure is absolute because the consequences are immediate and real.

“

Does she feel oppressed by this? Disempowered? No. She feels free. The rigidity of the system is what allows her to focus entirely on the craft of her work.

The checklists, the authority, the rules-they aren’t a cage; they’re a scaffold. They handle the known variables so she can dedicate her full cognitive load to the dynamic, unpredictable art of keeping a multi-million-dollar aquatic ecosystem alive.

This reminds me of another world built on structure and tradition, one that produces objects of focused, intentional beauty. The world of true artisans understands that constraints breed creativity. Think of the strictures of weaving a complex pattern into a tie; the precisely defined warp and weft, the loom’s mechanical reality, the historical weight of certain designs. There’s no flat hierarchy in a loom. There is a system, a process honed over generations. This is what allows for the creation of truly exceptional handmade silk ties, where every knot and thread contributes to a coherent whole. The structure is what makes the art possible. It removes the chaos of infinite choice and provides a channel for mastery.

It’s strange how we’ve come to idolize the opposite in our professional lives. We chase the myth of the frictionless, structureless workplace, believing that if we just remove all the lines and boxes, pure creativity will flourish. But mostly, what flourishes is anxiety. When it’s unclear who makes a decision, the conscientious and the junior-level employees bear the heaviest burden. They spin their wheels, trying to build consensus among people who have no real stake, terrified of stepping on the toes of some unseen center of power. They burn out trying to solve political puzzles instead of business problems. The budget for a project might be $42,472, but it gets stalled over a $2 debate because nobody knows who owns the decision.

Building Better Structures

Maybe the answer isn’t to abolish structure, but to build better, more transparent, Read More In this article honest structures. A hierarchy isn’t inherently evil. An org chart isn’t a prison. They are tools for clarity. They are meant to tell you who to talk to, who is accountable, and who can break the tie on the color of a goddamn button so everyone can get back to doing the work they were actually hired to do. We’ve become so obsessed with the feeling of empowerment that we’ve forgotten what it actually looks like: the freedom to execute your craft within a system you understand.